[949] | 1 | % $Id: exercise_cbl.tex 1657 2015-09-17 18:31:36Z maronga $ |
---|
| 2 | \input{header_tmp.tex} |
---|
| 3 | %\input{../header_lectures.tex} |
---|
| 4 | |
---|
| 5 | \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc} |
---|
| 6 | \usepackage{ngerman} |
---|
| 7 | \usepackage{pgf} |
---|
| 8 | \usepackage{subfigure} |
---|
| 9 | \usepackage{units} |
---|
| 10 | \usepackage{multimedia} |
---|
| 11 | \usepackage{hyperref} |
---|
| 12 | \newcommand{\event}[1]{\newcommand{\eventname}{#1}} |
---|
| 13 | \usepackage{xmpmulti} |
---|
| 14 | \usepackage{tikz} |
---|
| 15 | \usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning} |
---|
| 16 | \def\Tiny{\fontsize{4pt}{4pt}\selectfont} |
---|
[1534] | 17 | |
---|
| 18 | %---------- neue Pakete |
---|
[949] | 19 | \usepackage{amsmath} |
---|
| 20 | \usepackage{amssymb} |
---|
| 21 | \usepackage{multicol} |
---|
| 22 | \usepackage{pdfcomment} |
---|
| 23 | |
---|
[1534] | 24 | |
---|
[1515] | 25 | \institute{Institute of Meteorology and Climatology, Leibniz UniversitÀt Hannover} |
---|
| 26 | \selectlanguage{english} |
---|
[949] | 27 | \date{last update: \today} |
---|
| 28 | \event{PALM Seminar} |
---|
| 29 | \setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{} |
---|
| 30 | |
---|
| 31 | \setbeamertemplate{footline} |
---|
| 32 | { |
---|
| 33 | \begin{beamercolorbox}[rightskip=-0.1cm]& |
---|
| 34 | {\includegraphics[height=0.65cm]{imuk_logo.pdf}\hfill \includegraphics[height=0.65cm]{luh_logo.pdf}} |
---|
| 35 | \end{beamercolorbox} |
---|
| 36 | \begin{beamercolorbox}[ht=2.5ex,dp=1.125ex, |
---|
| 37 | leftskip=.3cm,rightskip=0.3cm plus1fil]{title in head/foot} |
---|
| 38 | {\leavevmode{\usebeamerfont{author in head/foot}\insertshortauthor} \hfill \eventname \hfill \insertframenumber \; / \inserttotalframenumber} |
---|
| 39 | \end{beamercolorbox} |
---|
| 40 | \begin{beamercolorbox}[colsep=1.5pt]{lower separation line foot} |
---|
| 41 | \end{beamercolorbox} |
---|
| 42 | } |
---|
| 43 | %\logo{\includegraphics[width=0.3\textwidth]{luhimuk_logo.pdf}} |
---|
| 44 | |
---|
| 45 | \title[Exercise 1: Convection Between Plates]{Exercise 1: Convection Between Plates} |
---|
[1515] | 46 | \author{PALM group} |
---|
[949] | 47 | |
---|
| 48 | \begin{document} |
---|
| 49 | |
---|
| 50 | % Folie 1 |
---|
| 51 | \begin{frame} |
---|
| 52 | \titlepage |
---|
| 53 | \end{frame} |
---|
| 54 | |
---|
[954] | 55 | \section{Exercise} |
---|
| 56 | \subsection{Exercise} |
---|
[949] | 57 | |
---|
| 58 | % Folie 2 |
---|
| 59 | \begin{frame} |
---|
| 60 | \frametitle{Exercise 1: Convection Between Plates} |
---|
| 61 | |
---|
| 62 | Please try to carry out a run with following initial and boundary conditions and create the required output. |
---|
| 63 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 64 | \scriptsize |
---|
| 65 | \item<2-> The simulation should represent a stationary convective boundary layer between two uniformly heated/cooled plates with zero mean flow. |
---|
| 66 | \item<3-> A free-slip condition for velocity shall be used at the bottom and top boundary. |
---|
| 67 | \item<4-> The sensible heat flux at the bottom and top boundary shall be constant throughout the simulation. |
---|
| 68 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 69 | \onslide<5-> Simulation features: |
---|
| 70 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 71 | \scriptsize |
---|
[1198] | 72 | \item<6-> domain size: about $\unit[2000 \times 2000 \times 1000]{m^3}$ ($x$/$y$/$z$) |
---|
[949] | 73 | \item<7-> grid size: $\unit[50]{m}$ equidistant |
---|
| 74 | \item<8-> simulated time: $\unit[3600]{s}$ |
---|
| 75 | \item<9-> surface heatflux: $\unit[0.1]{K\ m\ s^{-1}}$ |
---|
| 76 | \item<10-> heatflux at top: $\unit[0.1]{K\ m\ s^{-1}}$ |
---|
| 77 | \item<11-> initial temperature: $\unit[300]{K}$ everywhere |
---|
[1198] | 78 | \item<12-> initial velocity: zero everywhere |
---|
[949] | 79 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 80 | \end{frame} |
---|
| 81 | |
---|
| 82 | % Folie 3 |
---|
| 83 | \begin{frame} |
---|
| 84 | \frametitle{Questions to be Answered:} |
---|
| 85 | |
---|
| 86 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
[1198] | 87 | \item<1-> How does the flow field look like after 60 minutes of simulated time? (What kind of output do you need to answer this?) |
---|
| 88 | \item<2-> How do the horizontally and temporally averaged vertical temperature and heat flux profiles look like? |
---|
[1534] | 89 | \item<3-> Is it really a large-eddy simulation, i.e., are the subgrid-scale fluxes much smaller than the resolved-scale fluxes? (How long should the averaging time interval be?) |
---|
[949] | 90 | \item<4-> How do the total kinetic energy and the maximum velocity components change in time? Has the flow become stationary? |
---|
| 91 | \item<5-> Has the domain size and grid size been chosen appropriately? |
---|
| 92 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 93 | |
---|
| 94 | \end{frame} |
---|
| 95 | |
---|
| 96 | % Folie 4 |
---|
| 97 | \begin{frame} |
---|
| 98 | \frametitle{Hints (I)} |
---|
| 99 | \scriptsize |
---|
| 100 | |
---|
| 101 | PALM parameter names are displayed by courier style, e.g. \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{end\_time}}.\\ |
---|
| 102 | |
---|
| 103 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 104 | \item<2-> Domain size |
---|
| 105 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 106 | \scriptsize |
---|
[1198] | 107 | \item[-]<2-> Is controlled by grid size (\textcolor{blue}{\texttt{dx}}, \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{dy}}, \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{dz}}) and number of grid points (\textcolor{blue}{\texttt{nx}}, \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{ny}}, \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{nz}}). Since the first grid point along each of the directions has index 0, the total number of grid points used are \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{nx}}+1, \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{ny}}+1, \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{nz}}+1. The total domain size in case of cyclic horizontal boundary conditions is (\textcolor{blue}{\texttt{nx}}+1)*\textcolor{blue}{\texttt{dx}}, (\textcolor{blue}{\texttt{ny}}+1)*\textcolor{blue}{\texttt{dy}}. |
---|
[949] | 108 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 109 | |
---|
| 110 | \item<3-> Initial profiles |
---|
| 111 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 112 | \scriptsize |
---|
| 113 | \item[-]<3-> Constant with height. See parameter \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{initializing\_actions}} for available initialization methods. See \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{ug\_surface}}, \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{vg\_surface}} and \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{pt\_surface}} for initial values of velocity and potential temperature. |
---|
| 114 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 115 | |
---|
| 116 | \item<4-> Boundary conditions |
---|
| 117 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 118 | \scriptsize |
---|
| 119 | \item[-]<4-> For velocity, see \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{bc\_uv\_b}} and \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{bc\_uv\_t}}. See also \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{prandtl\_layer}}, because Neumann conditions donât allow to use a Prandtl-layer. |
---|
| 120 | \item[-]<5-> For temperature / heat flux, see \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{surface\_heatflux}} and \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{top\_heatflux}}. Prescribing of heat flux at the boundary requires a Neumann boundary condition for temperature, see \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{bc\_pt\_b}} and \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{bc\_pt\_t}}. |
---|
| 121 | \item[-]<6-> Use a Neumann condition also for the perturbation pressure both at the bottom and the top (\textcolor{blue}{\texttt{bc\_p\_b}}, \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{bc\_p\_t}}). |
---|
| 122 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 123 | |
---|
[1534] | 124 | \item<7-> Simulation time: See parameter \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{end\_time}} |
---|
[949] | 125 | |
---|
| 126 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 127 | |
---|
| 128 | \end{frame} |
---|
| 129 | |
---|
| 130 | % Folie 5 |
---|
| 131 | \begin{frame} |
---|
| 132 | \frametitle{Hints (II)} |
---|
| 133 | \footnotesize |
---|
| 134 | |
---|
| 135 | Hints for data output. |
---|
| 136 | |
---|
| 137 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 138 | |
---|
| 139 | \item<2-> Variables |
---|
| 140 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 141 | \footnotesize |
---|
| 142 | \item[-]<2-> Output variables are chosen with parameters \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{data\_output}} (3d-data or 2d-cross-sections) and \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{data\_output\_pr}} (profiles). |
---|
| 143 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 144 | |
---|
| 145 | \item<3-> Output intervals |
---|
| 146 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 147 | \footnotesize |
---|
| 148 | \item[-]<3-> Output intervals are set with parameter \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{dt\_data\_output}}. This parameter affects all output (cross-sections, profiles, etc.). Individual temporal intervals for the different output quantities can be assigned using parameters \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{dt\_do3d}}, \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{dt\_do2d\_xy}}, \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{dt\_do2d\_xz}}, \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{dt\_do2d\_yz}}, \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{dt\_dopr}}, etc. |
---|
| 149 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 150 | |
---|
| 151 | \item<4-> Time averaging |
---|
| 152 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 153 | \footnotesize |
---|
| 154 | \item[-]<4-> Time averaging is controlled with parameters \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{averaging\_interval}}, \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{averaging\_interval\_pr}}, \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{dt\_averaging\_input}}, \textcolor{blue}{\texttt{dt\_averaging\_input\_pr}}. |
---|
| 155 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 156 | |
---|
| 157 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 158 | |
---|
| 159 | \end{frame} |
---|
| 160 | |
---|
| 161 | % Folie 6 |
---|
| 162 | \begin{frame} |
---|
| 163 | \frametitle{Further Hints} |
---|
| 164 | |
---|
[1198] | 165 | \onslide<2-> You will find some more detailed information to solve this exercise in the PALM-online-documentation under:\\ |
---|
[949] | 166 | \ \\ |
---|
[1649] | 167 | \small\url{http://palm.muk.uni-hannover.de/trac/wiki/doc/app/examples/cbl}\\ |
---|
[949] | 168 | \ \\ |
---|
[1198] | 169 | \normalsize (Attention: This documentation is for atmospheric convection with free upper lid.) |
---|
[949] | 170 | \ \\ |
---|
[1198] | 171 | \ \\ |
---|
[1515] | 172 | \onslide<3-> \normalsize Please also visit\\ |
---|
[949] | 173 | \ \\ |
---|
[1649] | 174 | \small\url{http://palm.muk.uni-hannover.de/trac/wiki/doc/app/netcdf}\\ |
---|
[949] | 175 | \ \\ |
---|
| 176 | \normalsize where the complete PALM netCDF-data-output and the respective steering parameters are described. |
---|
| 177 | |
---|
| 178 | \end{frame} |
---|
| 179 | |
---|
| 180 | % Folie 7 |
---|
| 181 | \begin{frame} |
---|
| 182 | \frametitle{How to Start?} |
---|
| 183 | |
---|
| 184 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 185 | \item<2-> Create a data directory for a new run:\\ |
---|
| 186 | \quad \texttt{cd \~{}/palm/current\_version}\\ |
---|
| 187 | \quad \texttt{mkdir -p JOBS/uniform\_plates/INPUT} |
---|
| 188 | |
---|
| 189 | \item<3-> Create the parameter file and set the required parameters in\\ |
---|
| 190 | \quad \texttt{JOBS/uniform\_plates/INPUT/uniform\_plates\_p3d} |
---|
| 191 | |
---|
| 192 | \item<4-> Start the run with \texttt{mrun-command}\\ |
---|
| 193 | \quad \texttt{mrun -d uniform\_plates -h <hi> -K parallel ...}\\ |
---|
| 194 | and analyze the output files. |
---|
| 195 | |
---|
| 196 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 197 | |
---|
| 198 | \ \\ |
---|
| 199 | |
---|
| 200 | \onslide<5-> \huge \centering \textcolor{blue}{Good Luck!} |
---|
| 201 | |
---|
| 202 | \end{frame} |
---|
| 203 | |
---|
[1657] | 204 | \bgroup |
---|
| 205 | \setbeamercolor{background canvas}{bg=white} |
---|
| 206 | \begin{frame}[plain,noframenumbering]{} |
---|
| 207 | \end{frame} |
---|
| 208 | \egroup |
---|
| 209 | |
---|
[954] | 210 | % Folie 8 |
---|
| 211 | \section{Results} |
---|
| 212 | \subsection{Results} |
---|
[949] | 213 | |
---|
[954] | 214 | \begin{frame} |
---|
[1515] | 215 | \frametitle{$xy$-cross sections (instantaneous at $t = \unit[3600]{s}$)} |
---|
[954] | 216 | \begin{center} |
---|
[1534] | 217 | \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{exercise_cbl_figures/xy_w_100.eps} |
---|
| 218 | \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{exercise_cbl_figures/xy_w_500.eps}\\ |
---|
| 219 | \includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{exercise_cbl_figures/xy_w_750.eps} |
---|
[954] | 220 | \end{center} |
---|
| 221 | \end{frame} |
---|
[949] | 222 | |
---|
[954] | 223 | % Folie 9 |
---|
| 224 | \begin{frame} |
---|
| 225 | \frametitle{$xz$-cross sections ($\unit[900]{s}$ average)} |
---|
[1534] | 226 | \includegraphics[width=0.52\textwidth]{exercise_cbl_figures/xz_w_y250m.eps} |
---|
| 227 | \includegraphics[width=0.52\textwidth]{exercise_cbl_figures/xz_w_y500m.eps}\\ |
---|
| 228 | \includegraphics[width=0.52\textwidth]{exercise_cbl_figures/xz_w_y750m.eps} |
---|
| 229 | \includegraphics[width=0.52\textwidth]{exercise_cbl_figures/xz_w_y1000m.eps} |
---|
[954] | 230 | \end{frame} |
---|
| 231 | |
---|
| 232 | % Folie 10 |
---|
| 233 | \begin{frame} |
---|
[1534] | 234 | \frametitle{Vertical profiles} |
---|
[954] | 235 | \begin{center} |
---|
[1515] | 236 | \includegraphics[angle=90,width=\textwidth]{exercise_cbl_figures/pr_pt.eps} |
---|
[954] | 237 | \end{center} |
---|
| 238 | \end{frame} |
---|
| 239 | |
---|
| 240 | % Folie 11 |
---|
| 241 | \begin{frame} |
---|
| 242 | \frametitle{LES?} |
---|
| 243 | \begin{center} |
---|
[1534] | 244 | \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{exercise_cbl_figures/pr_wpt_res_sgs.eps} |
---|
[954] | 245 | \end{center} |
---|
| 246 | \end{frame} |
---|
| 247 | |
---|
| 248 | % Folie 12 |
---|
| 249 | \begin{frame} |
---|
| 250 | \frametitle{Time series (I)} |
---|
| 251 | \begin{center} |
---|
[1515] | 252 | \includegraphics[angle=90,width=1.0\textwidth]{exercise_cbl_figures/ts.eps} |
---|
[954] | 253 | \end{center} |
---|
| 254 | \end{frame} |
---|
| 255 | |
---|
| 256 | % Folie 13 |
---|
| 257 | \begin{frame} |
---|
| 258 | \frametitle{Time series (II)} |
---|
| 259 | \begin{center} |
---|
[1515] | 260 | \includegraphics[angle=90,width=1.0\textwidth]{exercise_cbl_figures/ts2.eps} |
---|
[954] | 261 | \end{center} |
---|
| 262 | \end{frame} |
---|
[1534] | 263 | |
---|
| 264 | |
---|
| 265 | \subsection{Answers} |
---|
| 266 | |
---|
| 267 | % Folie 14 |
---|
| 268 | \begin{frame} |
---|
| 269 | \frametitle{Answers to question I} |
---|
| 270 | \footnotesize |
---|
| 271 | How does the flow field look like after 60 minutes of simulated time? |
---|
| 272 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 273 | \item Useful output: for example instantaneous or time-averaged cross-sections of vertical velocity (frames 8--9). |
---|
| 274 | \item Flow field shows narrower updrafts and broader downdrafts, cellular pattern close to the heated/cooled plates in xy-sections of |
---|
| 275 | vertical velocity. |
---|
| 276 | \item The temporal mean of vertical velocity exhibits a circulation spanning the whole depth of the model domain. |
---|
| 277 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 278 | \end{frame} |
---|
| 279 | |
---|
| 280 | % Folie 15 |
---|
| 281 | \begin{frame} |
---|
| 282 | \frametitle{Answers to question II} |
---|
| 283 | \footnotesize |
---|
| 284 | How do the horizontally and temporally averaged vertical temperature and heat flux profiles look like? |
---|
| 285 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 286 | \item PALM standard profile output contains potential temperature and its vertical flux (shown in frame 10). |
---|
| 287 | \item Heating the lower plate and cooling the upper plate induces convection resulting in a well-mixed boundary layer where the |
---|
| 288 | potential temperature profile is constant with height. |
---|
| 289 | Temperature gradients remain at the domain boundaries since convective turbulence cannot remove them in the vicinity of the walls. |
---|
| 290 | \item In case of horizontal homogeneity, the temperature equation reduces to |
---|
| 291 | $\frac{\partial\theta}{\partial t}=-\frac{\partial\overline{w^{\prime}\theta^{\prime}}}{\partial z}$ in the present case. In a |
---|
| 292 | stationary state, it follows that $\frac{\partial\theta}{\partial t}= 0 $. Thus, the flux profile |
---|
| 293 | $\overline{w^{\prime}\theta^{\prime}}$ has to be constant with height -- as can be seen in frame 10. |
---|
| 294 | \item The total vertical heat flux is positive in the whole modeling domain indicating upward transport of warmer air |
---|
| 295 | parcels and downward transport of colder air parcels. |
---|
| 296 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 297 | \end{frame} |
---|
| 298 | |
---|
| 299 | % Folie 16 |
---|
| 300 | \begin{frame} |
---|
| 301 | \frametitle{Answers to question III} |
---|
| 302 | \footnotesize |
---|
| 303 | Is it really a large-eddy simulation? Duration of averaging time? |
---|
| 304 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 305 | \item It is a large-eddy simulation because the sub-grid fluxes are negligibly small throughout the bulk of the mixed layer. There, the |
---|
| 306 | resolved flux is dominating the total flux indicating a well-resolved turbulent flow (frame 11). Sub-grid fluxes dominate close to |
---|
| 307 | the surface where the turbulent-eddies cannot be resolved. |
---|
| 308 | \item Typically, the averaging time should contain several large-eddy turnover times. The large-eddy turnover time can be defined as |
---|
| 309 | $\tau_{\mathrm{l}}=L/u$ where $L$ is the length-scale of the largest eddies in the flow and $u$ is their typical velocity scale. |
---|
| 310 | $\tau_{\mathrm{l}}$ can be interpreted as a typical time a turbulent eddy needs to traverse the modeling domain. In our case, |
---|
| 311 | $L$ is proportional to the domain height ($L\approx1000\,\mathrm{m}$) and $u$ is about $5\,\mathrm{ms^{-1}}$ (see time series of |
---|
| 312 | wmax on frame 12). Thus, $\tau_{\mathrm{l}}\approx200\,\mathrm{s}$. An averaging time of 600\,s chosen here |
---|
| 313 | is, thus, appropriate. |
---|
| 314 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 315 | \end{frame} |
---|
| 316 | |
---|
| 317 | % Folie 17 |
---|
| 318 | \begin{frame} |
---|
| 319 | \frametitle{Answers to question IV} |
---|
| 320 | \footnotesize |
---|
| 321 | Has the flow become stationary? |
---|
| 322 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 323 | \item The time series of total kinetic energy E and the maximum velocities wmax, umax and vmax shown in frames 12-13 exhibit |
---|
| 324 | a spin-up phase of the model up to $t\approx2000\,\mathrm{s}$. During this initialization time, turbulence is triggered by |
---|
| 325 | random perturbations until turbulence starts to develop. |
---|
| 326 | \item A stationary state can be seen by means of an (almost) non-changing E with time. Constant maxima of the velocity |
---|
| 327 | components also indicate a stationary flow. |
---|
| 328 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 329 | \end{frame} |
---|
| 330 | |
---|
| 331 | % Folie 18 |
---|
| 332 | \begin{frame} |
---|
| 333 | \frametitle{Answers to question V} |
---|
| 334 | \footnotesize |
---|
| 335 | Has the domain size and grid size been chosen appropriately? |
---|
| 336 | \begin{itemize} |
---|
| 337 | \item A domain size is generally appropriately chosen in case that several of the dominating flow structures fit into the modeling |
---|
| 338 | domain. From the xy-cross sections in frame 8 it becomes apparent that the typical hexagonal flow structures close to the |
---|
| 339 | surface can hardly be seen. The xz-cross sections in frame 9 also contain only |
---|
| 340 | one circulation. Thus, the domain size in our example seems to be too small to capture several energy-containing flow structures. |
---|
| 341 | \item The grid size should be chosen in the way that the dominating flow structures can be represented by at least several |
---|
| 342 | grid points (4-5). A grid spacing of 50~m as chosen in this exercise |
---|
| 343 | is appropriate since the flow structures exhibit horizontal length scales of about 1~km (see frame 8). |
---|
| 344 | \end{itemize} |
---|
| 345 | \end{frame} |
---|
[949] | 346 | \end{document} |
---|