Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of doc/tec/noncyclic


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Mar 12, 2013 5:08:15 PM (12 years ago)
Author:
fricke
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • doc/tec/noncyclic

    v2 v3  
    2727{{{
    2828#!Latex
    29  s^{t + \Delta t}(k,j,-1) = s_{init}(k) \; .
     29 s^{t + \Delta t}(k,j,-1) = s_{init}(k) \; . \quad(1)
    3030 }}}
    3131t denotes the time, Δt the time step and s,,init,, the initialization profile of the scalar quantities which is constant in time.
     
    3434{{{
    3535#!Latex
    36  e^{t + \Delta t}(k,j,-1) = e^{t + \Delta t}(k,j,0) \; .
    37  }}}
     36 e^{t + \Delta t}(k,j,-1) = e^{t + \Delta t}(k,j,0) \; . \quad(2)
     37 }}}
     38To prevent gravity waves from being reflected at the inflow, a relaxation term can be added to the prognostic equations for the potential temperature θ (Davies, 1976):
     39{{{
     40#!Latex
     41 \theta^{t+1}(d) = ... - \Delta t \cdot K(d) \cdot \left( \theta^{t}(d) - \theta_{init} \right) \; . \quad(3)
     42 }}}
     43Here, d is the distance normal to the wall and θ,,init,, the initial value of the potential temperature, which corresponds to the value at the inflow boundary.
     44The damping or relaxation function K depends only on the distance d to the inflow.
     45K is calculated by
     46{{{
     47#!Latex
     48K(d) =
     49\begin{cases}
     50d_f \sin^2\left( \frac{\pi}{2} \frac{d_w - d}{d_w} \right) , \text{for } d < d_w \\  \qquad\quad  0  \qquad \quad \;\;\; , \text{for } d \ge d_w
     51\end{cases} . \quad (4)
     52 }}}
     53d,,f,, is a damping factor to control the damping intensity, and d,,w,, is the width of the relaxation region extending from the inflow. Quantities d,,f,, and d,,w,, can be set with parameters [../../app/inipar/#pt_damping_factor pt_damping_factor] and [../../app/inipar/#pt_damping_width pt_damping_width], respectively.
     54Both parameters have to be set by the user and must be adjusted case-by-case, because both parameters depend on the numerical and physical conditions, so that application of universal default values is not possible.
     55So far, we have experience with gravity waves in case of cold air outbreaks, which grow in amplitude up to quite extreme values, if no damping is applied.
     56In the respective simulations, we used typical values for [../../app/inipar/#pt_damping_factor pt_damping_factor] of 0.05 and for [../../app/inipar/#pt_damping_width pt_damping_width] of 25 km in order to prevent the gravity waves from growing.