37 | | * the "old" method ({{{most_method = 'circular'}}}, which is the fastest method, but inaccurate) |
38 | | |
39 | | * a new method based on the evaluation of the Richardson number to derive the Obukhov length by using a Newton iteration algorithm ({{{most_method = 'newton'}}} accurate, but relatively slow) |
40 | | |
41 | | * a new method based on the evaluation of the Richardson number to derive the Obukhov length using a lookup-table ({{{most_method = 'lookup'}}} accurate, faster than the Newton iteration method, but slightly slower than the old method) |
| 37 | * the "old" method ({{{most_method = 'circular'}}}, which is the fastest method, but inaccurate) |
| 38 | |
| 39 | * a new method based on the evaluation of the Richardson number to derive the Obukhov length by using a Newton iteration algorithm ({{{most_method = 'newton'}}} accurate, but relatively slow) |
| 40 | |
| 41 | * a new method (new default) based on the evaluation of the Richardson number to derive the Obukhov length using a lookup-table ({{{most_method = 'lookup'}}} accurate, faster than the Newton iteration method, but slightly slower than the old method). Please note that this method cannot be used when the surface roughness (in terms of roughness length) is not homogeneously distributed. |