Index: palm/trunk/TUTORIAL/SOURCE/topography.tex
===================================================================
--- palm/trunk/TUTORIAL/SOURCE/topography.tex	(revision 1226)
+++ palm/trunk/TUTORIAL/SOURCE/topography.tex	(revision 1515)
@@ -6,5 +6,4 @@
 \usepackage{ngerman}
 \usepackage{pgf}
-\usetheme{Dresden}
 \usepackage{subfigure}
 \usepackage{units}
@@ -24,5 +23,6 @@
 \usepackage{xcolor}
 
-\institute{Institut fÃŒr Meteorologie und Klimatologie, Leibniz UniversitÃ€t Hannover}
+\institute{Institute of Meteorology and Climatology, Leibniz UniversitÃ€t Hannover}
+\selectlanguage{english}
 \date{last update: \today}
 \event{PALM Seminar}
@@ -43,5 +43,5 @@
 
 \title[PALM - Using Topography]{PALM - Using Topography}
-\author{Siegfried Raasch}
+\author{PALM group}
 
 % Notes:
@@ -53,4 +53,7 @@
 \titlepage
 \end{frame}
+
+\section{Topography}
+\subsection{Topography}
 
 % Folie 2
@@ -240,5 +243,4 @@
          \item{ArcGIS (commercial)}
          \item{GRASS GIS (freeware)}
-         \item{...? (please report to us)}
       \end{itemize}
    \end{itemize}
@@ -249,5 +251,5 @@
    \frametitle{Realization â \\ Numerical / Technical Implementation (IV)}  
    \small
-   \textbf{Potential issues}
+   \textbf{Potential issue}
    \begin{itemize}
       \item{Load imbalance} 
@@ -259,11 +261,4 @@
          \end{itemize}
       \end{itemize}     
-      \item{\dq 2 $\Delta$x\dq instabilities (only if Piacsek-Williams advection scheme is used)}
-      \begin{itemize}
-         \item{Upstream of obstacle walls}
-         \item{Due to second-order finite difference advection scheme}
-         \item{Model remains stable throughout the simulation}
-         \item{The default Wicker-Skamarock scheme does not show any instabilities}
-      \end{itemize}
    \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
@@ -280,6 +275,5 @@
       \item[-]{Obstacles must be surface-mounted}
       \item[-]{Grid boxes can only be 100\% fluid or 100\% obstacle \\ \par\smallskip
-              \begin{footnotesize} Obstacle surfaces that do not match the grid are approximated by grid boxes like a step-function, which 
- 	      modifies the real obstacle size \end{footnotesize}}
+              \begin{footnotesize} Obstacle surfaces that do not match the grid are approximated by grid boxes like a step-function, which can modify the real obstacle size or the orientation of the obstacle faces\end{footnotesize}}
       \item[-]{Overhanging structures, holes etc. are not permitted due to the \dq 2.5D\dq format}
    \end{itemize}
@@ -524,5 +518,5 @@
          \item{\textbf{Channel}: {\tt bc\_uv\_t =} \textbf{'dirichlet\_0' (no-slip)}}
          \item{\textbf{Open channel}: {\tt bc\_uv\_t =} \textbf{'neumann' (slip)}}
-         \item{\textbf{\dq Constant flux\dq layer} (not yet published): {\tt bc\_uv\_t =} \textbf{'neumann' (slip)} \\
+         \item{\textbf{\dq Constant flux\dq layer}: {\tt bc\_uv\_t =} \textbf{'neumann' (slip)} \\
                 with set-up E1 where {\tt dp\_level\_b >> 0} and {\tt dp\_smooth = .T.}}
       \end{itemize}
@@ -591,8 +585,5 @@
    \footnotesize
    \par\medskip
-   In most cases, a new parameter is added to PALM for one specific purpose.
-   \par\bigskip
-   Beyond this one purpose, each new parameter normally gives many other new feature/parameter combinations in PALM.
-   We are unable to check all these combinations by ourselves and rely on your help!
+   PALM's topography features have been frequently applied within the last years, but there may be still some parameter combinations which have not been used so far, and which may not work properly.
    \par\bigskip
 %    For example, the combination of topography and non-cyclic lateral boundary conditions has not yet been tested 
@@ -603,10 +594,53 @@
       \item{Please always check your PALM setup carefully. PALM is not a black box.} 
       \item{For example, design a simple case and test your expectation.}
-      \item{Please report potential bugs â thank you!}
-      \begin{itemize}
-         \item{PALM developer team}
-         \item{PALM user community (via trac-system)}
-      \end{itemize}
-   \end{itemize}
+      \item{Please report potential bugs using our trouble ticket system.}
+   \end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+% Folie 22
+\begin{frame}
+   \frametitle{Some recent examples of topography/building applications with PALM}
+   
+   \scriptsize
+   \textbf{Street canyon flows}
+   \par\smallskip
+   \tiny
+   \textbf{Letzel, M.O., M. Krane and S. Raasch 2008}: High resolution urban large-eddy simulation studies from street canyon to neighbourhood scale, Atmos. Env.,
+   \textbf{42}, 8770-8784, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.08.001.\\
+   \par\medskip
+
+   \scriptsize
+   \textbf{Turbulence generated by topography}
+   \par\smallskip
+   \tiny
+   \textbf{Esau, I. and I. Repina, 2012}: Wind climate in Kongsfjorden, Svalbard, and attribution of leading wind driving mechanisms through turbulence-resolving simulations. Advances in Meteorology, 
+   \textbf{Volume 2012}, Article ID 568454, 16 pages, doi:10.1155/2012/568454.\\
+   \par\medskip
+   
+   \scriptsize
+   \textbf{Airflow within or over building arrays}
+   \par\smallskip
+   \tiny
+   \textbf{Abd Razak A., A. Hagishima, N. Ikegaya and J. Tanimoto, 2013}: Analysis of airflow over building arrays for assessment of urban wind environment. Building and Environment,
+   \textbf{59}, 56-65, doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.08.007. \\
+   \par\smallskip
+   \textbf{Kanda, M., A. Inagaki, T. Miyamoto, M. Gryschka and S. Raasch 2013}: A New Aerodynamic Parameterization for Real Urban Surfaces, Boundary-Layer Meteorol.,
+    \textbf{148}, 357-377, doi:10.1007/s10546-013-9818-x. \\
+   \par\medskip
+       
+   \scriptsize
+   \textbf{Thermal effects of building walls}
+   \par\smallskip
+   \tiny
+   \textbf{Park, S.B., J.J. Baik, S. Raasch and M.O. Letzel 2012}: A large-eddy simulation study of thermal effects on turbulent flow and dispersion in and above a street canyon., J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol.,
+   \textbf{51}, 829-841, doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-11-0180.1.\\
+   \par\medskip
+
+   \scriptsize
+   \textbf{PALM coupled to a building energy model}
+   \par\smallskip
+   \tiny
+   \textbf{Yaghoobian, N., J. Kleissl and K. T. Paw U, 2014}: An Improved Three-Dimensional Simulation of the Diurnally Varying Street-Canyon Flow, Boundary-Layer Meteorol.,
+   doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10546-014-9940-4.\\
 \end{frame}
 
@@ -653,8 +687,8 @@
          \begin{tikzpicture}[remember picture, overlay]
             \uncover<1>{\node at (0,-0.5) {\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{topography_figures/scenario_ssc_example_1.png}};}
-            \uncover<2>{\node at (0,-0.5) {\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{topography_figures/scenario_ssc_example_2.png}};}
-            \uncover<3->{\node at (0,-0.5) {\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{topography_figures/scenario_ssc_example_3.png}};}
-            \uncover<4->{\node at (-3.5,-0.2) {\includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{topography_figures/scenario_ssc_example_4.png}};}
-            \uncover<5->{\node at (3.5,-0.2) {\includegraphics[width=0.38\textwidth]{topography_figures/scenario_ssc_example_5.png}};}
+            \uncover<2->{\node at (0,-0.5) {\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{topography_figures/scenario_ssc_example_2.png}};}
+            %\uncover<3->{\node at (0,-0.5) {\includegraphics[width=0.7\textwidth]{topography_figures/scenario_ssc_example_3.png}};}
+            \uncover<3->{\node at (-3.5,-0.2) {\includegraphics[width=0.48\textwidth]{topography_figures/scenario_ssc_example_4.png}};}
+            \uncover<4->{\node at (3.5,-0.2) {\includegraphics[width=0.38\textwidth]{topography_figures/scenario_ssc_example_5.png}};}
          \end{tikzpicture}
          };
